What is the burden of proof required during a captain's mast?

The burden of proof required during a captain's mast is best described as "preponderance of evidence." This standard means that the evidence presented must show that it is more likely than not that the allegations against the individual are true. It requires the decision-makers to determine if the evidence leans more heavily in favor of one side over the other.

This standard is commonly used in administrative proceedings, including captain's mast, as it is a less stringent requirement than the criminal standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt." In essence, it allows for a conclusion that, while not absolute, suggests a higher likelihood of truth in the claims being made. The concept of clear and convincing evidence is a higher standard than preponderance and is typically reserved for specific types of cases, often in civil context but not applicable for captain's mast proceedings. Probable cause, on the other hand, is generally a standard used primarily in criminal law to justify a search or arrest, making it also unsuitable for captain's mast situations.